Thursday, March 11, 2010

Faith in Open Borders

Mark TooleyBy Mark Tooley
Institute on Religion & Democracy

Joining with groups like ACORN, a wide coalition of religious left groups will march on Washington, D.C. on March 21 on behalf of eventual amnesty and largely open borders under the rubric of Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR). The National Council of Churches (NCC) is even hailing CIR as a “divine mandate” and a “patriotic act.”

At least the NCC is acknowledging patriotism is a virtue of sorts. New York Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer is touting CIR, but no one believes it legislatively stands any chance in this year’s U.S. Congress. Maybe the religious left is praying for a divine miracle to enact its dream of a borderless America. The rally is titled “March For America: Change Takes Courage and Faith.” Once again, the religious left is exploiting “faith” to advance and echo the secular left’s hard core agenda. Its irate activists will gather on the U.S. Capitol’s West Lawn to insist that God opposes well regulated borders for the U.S.

“We hope to show the moral urgency of repairing America’s broken immigration system,” explained an immigration spokesman for the National Council of Churches and its relief arm, Church World Service. “It will be demonstrated in a dramatic display of unity among supporters of comprehensive immigration reform – people of faith, immigrant rights groups, labor groups, and others from all across the United States.” Reputedly, church immigration activists have already been “hosting prayer vigils and potluck suppers and meeting with members of Congress in their home districts for months,” laying the spiritual and political groundwork for the March 21 march on Washington. “Help us keep this momentum by joining us for this great action in Washington,” he further implored.

United Methodist, Episcopal, and Presbyterian agencies, the National Council of Churches, Jim Wallis Sojourners types, the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), and left-wing Catholic orders are endorsing the march. Phoenix United Methodist Bishop Minerva CarcaƱo will provide oratory to help to rev up the marchers, as will Sharon Watkins, President of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). “The event is expected to draw a crowd of 100,000 or more, including many evangelicals who have been inspired by the NAE’s resolution on immigration,” boasted the NAE’s website. “This is a critical moment in the struggle for immigration reform this year.”

But the march’s co-sponsor is the decidedly less religious “Reform Immigration for America,” whose members include ACORN, CodePink, National Council of LaRaza, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, and People for the American Way, among many others, including labor groups, like the AFL-CIO. Plus, of course, the Council on American Islamic Relations and Muslim Public Affairs Council are signed on. The church groups are specifically urging support for Illinois Democratic Congressman Rep. Luis Gutierrez’s Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act.

In their further attempt to camouflage a liberalized immigration political stance as a religious imperative, the National Council of Churches is asking its 35 member denominations to exploit the Christian pre-Easter season of Lent to mobilize for the Gutierrez CIR legislation. This exploitation of a traditional time of prayer and self-denial, in memory of Christ’s suffering, for fairly crass political purposes is not new for the NCC. Infamously, the NCC similarly exploited Lent in 1995 to rally churches against the new Republican Congress’ “Contract with America,” which of course the NCC saw as an assault on the Gospel. The NCC even asked churches to display purple ribbons during Holy Week in solidarity with Clinton Administration resistance.

This time, in a February 2010 letter from the NCC’s General Secretary, and other liberal prelates, including the Episcopal Church’s Presiding Bishop, the religious leftists are citing Lent as the perfect season for immigration lobbying. “As Christian leaders, we write to you on the eve of our shared Lenten journey about an issue of urgent concern to all of us in this nation: Comprehensive Immigration Reform.” They complain that “12 million immigrants living in the United States find themselves without the hope of becoming citizens, reuniting with family members or enjoying the legal protections that most of us take for granted,” without specifically admitting that these persons entered the U.S. illegally. The NCC warned: “Unless there are major policy changes enacted by the U.S. Congress, many of these people will continue to languish in the shadows and be subjected to abuse, discrimination and hardships that are contrary to the Gospel values of love, unity and the affirmation of the dignity of all people.”

According to the NCC et. al., lobbying for CIR reminds us of “our interrelatedness and interdependence with every child of God, and are called not only to come to the aid of one another, but are commanded to rise to support those who are marginalized in our society.” Apparently God’s support for CIR is very clear. “In response to this divine mandate, and as a patriotic act in the spirit of our nation’s best values and traditions, we join together with our brothers and sisters from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, National Association of Evangelicals, National Hispanic Leadership Conference and millions of other people of faith throughout the country in calling for comprehensive immigration reform that will improve and protect the lives of millions of people, in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and international agreements.”

Of course, the NCC and crowd are unclear, or unconcerned, about how liberalized immigration and eventual amnesty will affect America’s unemployed, how it will affect millions of legal immigrants, how it will affect overall law enforcement, how it will affect countless millions overseas who endure persecution or greater poverty than most Mexican or Central American illegals but lack the ability to walk across the border, and how a virtually open border only undermines attempts at economic and political reforms south of America’s borders.

Most important, neither traditional Christian nor Jewish teaching specifically offers a political immigration policy. Divine commands for fairness and justice do not automatically equal liberalized immigration, any more than they equate to socialized medicine, global warming alarmism, or American disarmament. But the religious left, uncomfortable with the theology and moral teachings of its own traditions, prefers the supposed clarity and liberation of left-wing activism.


Related Links


The Left Is Still Not Right - Olive Tree Ministries (Jan Markell)
The biblical position on illegal immigration - WorldNetDaily (Joseph Farah)
Get ready for the know all, see all national ID card...plus, plus - Canada Free Press
Obama gets pressed on immigration issue - USA Today
How does God view illegal immigration? - GotQuestions.org


Palestinians Call off Talks Over New Jerusalem Construction

David HockingBy David Hocking
Hope for Today

(Israel Today) The Palestinian Authority on Wednesday said it would not begin much-anticipated indirect peace talks with Israel until the latter cancels a decision to build 1,600 more apartments in the Jewish neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo in northeastern Jerusalem.

Israel announced the approval of the new project on Tuesday, in the midst of US Vice President Joe Biden's visit to the region, a fact that greatly irritated the American, who immediately issued a public condemnation of both the timing and substance of the announcement.

But Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas told Biden that condemnations were not enough, and that he would not take part in US-brokered peace talks until Israel rescinds the decision.

Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat reiterated that position on Wednesday:

"We want to hear from [United States envoy George] Mitchell that Israel has cancelled the decision to build housing units before we start the negotiations."

Israeli lawmakers responded by insisting that Jewish construction in Jerusalem will never again be stopped.

"People who feel we embarrassed Biden don’t understand our rights to Jerusalem," Minister of Diaspora Affairs Yuli Edelstein told Arutz 7 radio. "If someone thinks that in the framework of peace talks we will agree to split Jerusalem, he is mistaken."


Related Links


Palestinians call off talks over new Jerusalem construction - Israel Today
Palestinians fire rocket into Israel, no casualties - AFP
US and Israel dodge settlement confrontation - BBC
PA: Peace talks off until plan shelved - Ha'aretz
Unease Hangs Over Mideast as Biden Ends Israel Trip - New York Times
Former Mossad Chief: US President Pushing Islamic Agenda - Yeshiva World News


Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Will Christians Who Do Not Believe in the Pre-Tribulation Rapture Be Left Behind?

Ed HindsonBy Ed Hindson
World Prophetic Ministry

Q. Will Christians who do not believe in the pre-Tribulation Rapture be left behind when it takes place?

A. No, they will not, because our participation in an event is not predicated on our belief in that event happening, but on the truth of the Gospel. Some Christians do not believe in a Millennial Kingdom, but that will not prevent Jesus Christ from reigning on the Earth for 1,000 years at that time, nor will it exclude them from being there. Some unsaved people do not believe in Hell, but that will not keep them from going there if they continue to reject salvation through Christ.

Since the Rapture is designed to take the Bride (Church) home to the Father’s House for her marriage to the Lamb (Christ), the entire Church will go up in the Rapture. Otherwise, the Bride would be incomplete.


Related Links


The Rapture of the Church - Ariel Ministries (Arnold Fruchtenbaum)
The Rapture Of The Church - John MacArthur
The Rapture Question - Spirit & Truth
The Rapture: Who Will Face the Tribulation? (Tim LaHaye Prophecy Library)


Hamas, Hizbullah May Push Israel to War

Chris SchangBy Chris Schang
The Rapture Report

The Israel National News is currently quoting an "Aviation Week" publication as saying that the Iranian terrorist proxy groups Hamas and Hizbollah may end up pushing Israel to war in the near future. The article gives a likely war timeframe of this year or 2011. The report cited increased arms buildups of weapons past 2006 levels. The INN news article reports:

Worrisome escalations in arms stockpiling by Hamas and Hizbullah have convinced defense analysts that another war with Israel is on the horizon this year or in 2011, according to the highly respected Aviation Week.

The publication relied on intelligence estimates that the two terrorist organizations, sponsored by Iran and Syria, have armed themselves far beyond their stockpiles of 2006, when both Hamas and Hizbullah kidnapped Israeli soldiers within a three-week period.
Further:
Aviation Week noted that while Hamas and Hizbullah probably do not want an all-out war now, the current relative calm “may be illusory - Tehran and Damascus could encourage Hamas and Hizbullah to attack Israel in furtherance of their regional aims." The journal added that "Iran has also threatened retaliation if Israel attacks its nuclear program; and with popular unrest a constant threat to the leadership in Tehran, a war with Israel, fought through Hamas or Hezbollah, could be one way of diverting Iranian public attention away from the regime.”
The "Aviation Week" article makes excellent points because many analysts have speculated that as Iran drives to the finish line on their nuclear program, it is likely that Iran will have their proxy terrorist organizations divert attention away with a very serious armed conflict.

The Iranians are gambling that by arming the terrorist organizations to the teeth, Israel will focus more on the immediate threat on the borders than the long term threat of a nuclear bomb being built in Iran. Iran has made sure that if and when a conflict arises, the terrorists have plenty of ammunition to keep Israel busy. With reports claiming that new missiles and longer range rockets are in the terrorists arsenal, it is expected that in any future conflict the whole state of Israel will take a beating as Hamas and Hizbollah rain down rockets on Israeli towns and citizens.

To confirm this, the INN article went on to further state:
In the south, Hamas has smuggled in and assembled weapons far more destructive than those they possessed in the past, including advanced anti-aircraft missiles that can down Israeli planes. “Restoring Hamas’s arsenal with advanced ordnance is a major part of Iran’s strategy of targeting Israel from Lebanon and Gaza,” according to Aviation Week.

Hamas also has apparently acquired the same type of advanced anti-tank missiles that Hizbullah used against advance Israeli tanks in the Second Lebanon War. Another factor in the war scenario is the international al-Qaeda global jihad terror organization, whose influence is spreading in Gaza.
With the threat of advanced weapons and rockets being fired down onto Israel, it would be hard to imagine that the Israelis will sit still long while the threat continues to grow. At the same time, Israel must decide which threat they are going to tackle first, Iran or the terrorist proxies on their border.

I would imagine that if Iran has any say so in the matter, Israel will end up facing the "new and improved" terrorist capabilities while they try to fend off an attack on their nuclear facilities. With Iran about to reach the threshold of "no return" when it comes to their nuclear program, it is likely that Israel will end up fighting both Iran and their proxy terrorists.

It is quite possible that the Israel and terrorist showdown could fulfill the prophecies of Psalm 83 and perhaps even Isaiah 17 if Syria makes good on their defense pacts and threatens to fight with the terrorists. With Syria having moved the state archives out of Damascus, we could be on the verge of seeing something major happen in the Middle East.

Iran on the other hand is likely to be involved in the still future Ezekiel 38-39 war where Russia leads a moslem coalition against Israel. This Gog/Magog coalition gets the surprise of their life when the God of Israel decides to supernaturally intervene and destroy the invading forces.

Whenever and whatever the timing maybe, it looks like we might not have much time left to wait. The Bible tells us that when we see the signs of the end times, to look up, that our redemption is drawing nigh.

God bless.


Related Links

Aviation Week: Hamas, Hizbullah May Push Israel to War - INN
Gates in Saudi Arabia for Talks Focused on Iran - Voice of America
IDF Chief of Staff: All options on Iran should remain open - Ha'aretz
Israeli housing push hits peace moves - Financial Times
Isralestine: The Ancient Blueprints of the Future Middle East - Bill Salus (Book)


NATO - Not Dead Yet

Chuck MisslerBy Chuck Missler
Koinonia House

NATO appears to be in trouble. Europe lacks full commitment to the organization and its military is underfunded. Last week, the US Defense Secretary lamented over NATO's deterioration and fueled the fires of those who argue that NATO has long outlasted its usefulness.

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates made it clear last week that NATO's weakness has been hurting the war effort in Afghanistan. "Right now, the alliance faces very serious, long-term, systemic problems," Gates said. Only five of its 28 member states are sticking by their agreements to spend two percent of their GDP on defense, and that lack of funding is hurting NATO's ability to buy the helicopters, cargo planes and spy drones necessary to fight effectively in Afghanistan.

One of NATO's purposes in Afghanistan has been to train the Afghan security forces to do their jobs so that the local government can fight on its own without outside help. NATO members, however, have only sent half of the 32,0000 trainers requested in order to teach the local security forces to do their jobs well. "Training and advising the security forces of other nations needs to become a key alliance mission," Gates said. "In Afghanistan, the alliance has struggled to field the trainers and mentors needed for this mission."

Support for the war has dwindled in Europe, especially in light of the corruption within Karzai's government. Yet, the war is not over, and it is imperative that the US maintain stability especially for the sake of Pakistan. If the Taliban overrun Pakistan with all of its nuclear weapons, the whole world will be in trouble. Europe, however, has not shown sufficient interest in maintaining a strong military force, and amidst complaints from US Cabinet officials that Europe does not do enough, some echo the sentiments of Andrew J Bacevich's "Let Europe Be Europe" in Foreign Policy magazine arguing that the US should just abandon NATO to the Europeans to handle all on their own.

While the need for NATO appeared to be over with the Cold War, other issues from the Balkans crisis to 21st century terrorism have arisen in the past twenty years to keep the alliance alive. The USSR may have been broken and Russia may be struggling, but its weakened military can still do damage. Europe and America still have common histories and cultures - convenient bonds that give both sides of the ocean plenty of reasons to remain committed to one another as allies.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed in 1949 as a defensive alliance in which each member was pledged to come to the aid of any of its members which were attacked militarily. However, at the 50th Anniversary Summit in Washington on April 23-24, 1999, NATO redefined itself in terms which appeared as a startling impetus toward the creation of a major new trans-global alliance. The new definition, as opposed to contributing toward regional and global stability, uncompromisingly identified the alliance as an offensive military threat to its neighbors. Since 1999, 12 new members have been added to NATO from eastern Europe and the Balkans, including Albania and Croatia just last year.

While some believe the time for NATO is over, the alliance isn't dead yet and even looks ready for another life boost. This fall another NATO summit will be held to present the updated vision of the alliance through a brand new Strategic Concept. Right now the Secretary General of NATO is drafting this new Strategic Concept in preparation for the 2010 summit at Lisbon, Portugal.

For centuries, Biblical scholars have been anticipating the re-emergence of the Roman Empire in its final phase. The bonding of Europe in recent decades would appear to be setting the stage for the final climax which the Bible portrays in such fascinating detail.


Related Links


NATO renewal requires European courage on Afghanistan - Christian Science Monitor
Gates: US Forces in Afghanistan May Speed Up Security Handover - Voice of America
House to vote on pullout from Afghanistan - Reuters
NATO falling short on Afghan training: US commander - AFP
Learn the Bible in 24 Hours - Chuck Missler (Book)


Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Pushback

Jack KinsellaBy Jack Kinsella
The Omega Letter

A new poll commissioned by CNN found that an astounding 56% of Americans think "the federal government has become so large and powerful that it poses an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens."

Fifty-six percent! That's a lot more than the percentage of the population that is Muslim (0.7%) or is gay (2-4%) or atheist (4%) or liberal (20%).

That's more that it took to elect Bill Clinton (43%) in 1992 and 1996 (41%), more than it took to elect George Bush (47.5% 2000, 50.7% 2004) and even more than it took to elect Barack Hussein Obama (52.9%).

More than half the country believes the government poses an IMMEDIATE threat to rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, the poll says. And the fact it was commissioned by CNN makes it doubly astonishing.

CNN led the liberal campaign to get Obama elected. CNN's fawning coverage of all things Obama was so unabashed that it prompted several books like Bernie Goldberg's "The Media's Slobbering Love Affair with Barack Obama."

The liberal media has so much of its credibility invested in Barack Hussein Obama that it is practically forced to spike any story that reflects badly on the Obama administration.

The spiking of the Tea Party rallies last year is a great example. Buffalo, N.Y. is a liberal city with a liberal government and a liberal media. On July 4th, thousands of Tea Partiers marched on Buffalo's downtown City Hall.

But if you didn't personally see it (or hear about it on Fox News), you wouldn't know it even happened. I have talked to at least a dozen people who live within ten miles of downtown Buffalo who didn't know anything about it.

Even Buffalo's local media spiked the story - despite the fact it was the biggest public demonstration that city has seen in a decade or more.

When the liberal media can't spike stories that reflect badly on the administration, it spins it.

Yesterday, I heard a CNN anchor blame the Republicans for 'blocking' a $10 billion unemployment extension because one Republican senator had the temerity to ask how it was to be paid for.

The Democrats have an overwhelming majority in both Houses of Congress. Blaming the Republicans for the failure of the Democrats to pass a bill is like blaming a tree for running into a car.

It isn't that the liberal mainstream media can't see the Obama administration for the train wreck that it is. It is just that they can't tell YOU about it - not and maintain any pretense of objectivity.

Last year, they were telling you that Obama the Messiah had come. Chris Matthews reported on air that he felt a 'thrill run up his leg' (yuck!!) when Obama was speaking.

The NYTimes published a virtual photo album of carefully-retouched photographs of Obama, all framing him in iconic quasi-religious themes.

The coverage was SO fawning that Obama himself once joked; ". . .contrary to popular belief, I was not born in a manger. I was actually born on the Planet Krypton."

The joke would have been funny if it had been made ABOUT him. But it was made BY him. So it was hard to tell if he was kidding.

CNN tried to sugar-coat the story by saying the majority poll "reflected a partisan divide."

"The survey indicates a partisan divide on the question: Only 37 percent of Democrats, 63 percent of independents and nearly seven in 10 Republicans say the federal government poses a threat to the rights of Americans."

Ok. Let's stop there. In a 2009 Gallup poll, only 21% of Americans self-identified as liberal, broken down as 16% who say they are “liberal” and 5% who say they are “very liberal.”

Thirty-five percent of Americans self-identified as "moderate."

In the same poll, fully 40% of Americans self identify as either “conservative” (31%) or “very conservative” (9%).

One-third of all Democrats, two-thirds of all independents (moderates) and 70% of Republicans believe that the federal government under the Obama administration poses a "threat" to American freedom.

Freedom is partisan?

Despite the fact that other polls show that a similar majority of Americans want Obama to scrap the health care bill and start over, the administration seems determined to ram through a modified version of this one by any means necessary, even at the cost of losing the Congress.

Nancy Pelosi admitted as much in a recent ABC News interview. Whether she intended to or not is an open question - you tell me.

"We're not here just to self perpetuate our service in Congress. We're here to do the job for the American people."
You see, they aren't there just to 'self-perpetuate their service' in Congress. There's other stuff they do besides that. Like doing a job 'for the American people'. Even if two-thirds of them don't want them to.

The whole comment put me in mind of a Boy Scout trying to earn a merit badge by helping a little old lady across the street - whether she wanted to go or not.

The combination of 9/11, the war on terror, the Patriot Act, the Iraq War, the resurging Taliban and the collapsing economy created the perfect political storm.

By a quirk of fate, the Far Left found itself in control of both the legislative and executive branches of government, with the full support of an activist judiciary and the liberal media.

The resulting pushback, as reflected by these poll numbers, is actually strengthening their hand, at least temporarily.

The handwriting is already on the wall - Pelosi knows she won't be Speaker next January. She probably won't even be in the Congress. Ditto for Harry Reid.

Most of the old school Democrats are lame ducks hoping to avoid indictment by retiring; Charlie Rangel, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, etc.; with the conventional wisdom saying that in November, most of the incumbents will get their walking papers.

So they have nothing to lose by ramming their health care bill through.

But I don't believe it's as much about health care as it is about clearing away some of the obstacles posed by the Constitution.

The Left has twin goals in this effort. The first is control, of course, but the second is aimed directly at the Constitution via the Tenth Amendment.

Obama once described the U.S. Constitution as having “deep flaws” - in a discussion referring specifically to the Tenth Amendment.

During a September 2001 Chicago public radio program, he also that the country’s Founding Fathers had “an enormous blind spot” when they wrote it.

Obama also concluded in the same program that the Constitution “reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day.”

The Tenth Amendment says that any rights not specifically given to the federal government are reserved for the states and for the people. Health insurance isn't in there.

(I heard one liberal argue that it is in the 'general welfare' clause, but that is clueless. "General welfare" doesn't mean using the IRS to fine people who don't buy IRS-approved health insurance.)

Obama’s statements came during a panel discussion that aired on Chicago’s WBEZ-FM on Sept. 6, 2001, titled “Slavery and the Constitution.”

The discussion that led to the statements took place on the now-defunct Odyssey program, which also aired statements by Obama bemoaning the fact that the Civil Rights movement had failed to bring about an economic redistribution of wealth in America.

Obama's no-holds-barred get-it-done-before-anybody-notices health care agenda is aimed at rectifying that shortcoming by forcing a Constitutional crisis over state's rights as guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment.

Ironically, 'states rights' is the same Constitutional issue that forced the last US Civil War.


Related Links

CNN Poll: Majority think government poses threat to citizens' rights - CNN
Coburn: Reconciliation Strategy Will Backfire - Roll Call
Healthcare reform: Obama's march is still on - Christian Science Monitor
Obama back on the campaign trail, this time for health care - USA Today
The Last Generation - Jack Kinsella (Book)